Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:51 AM
To: 'Post miljoklagenemnda'; '[email protected]'
Cc: 'SecGen: Tom Radahl'; 'HeadComm: Jon Berg'; 'DirGen: Org: Jon Rorvik'; 'DirGen: Intnl Coop: Hege Andenas'; 'Arne Blix'; 'Ed: Hilde Haugsjerd'; 'Trine Eilertsen'; 'Hans Tore Bjerkaas'; 'Alf Hildrum'; 'Torry Pedersen'
Subject: RE: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG
Climate and Pollution Agency
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06
Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96)
Dear Sirs/Ladies:
RE: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG
This is rather unusual, in my experience.
In South Africa if you submit a complaint to a court; you are given a Case Number for the case. If there is an error in the application, the court clerks inform you of the specific error that allegedly requires your correction.
Yet you have provided a 'reference number for an inquiry', with no additional information or any reasons for not providing a court case number.
Is "2012/708 - 1" the case number for my complaint?
It does not appear so to me, since the case numbers of cases on your website are numbered differently; such as:
Sak: 2012/1
Sak: 2011/5
Sak: 2011/4
Sak: 2011/3
Sak: 2011/1
There is already a case: Sak: 2012/1; so logically this would be Sak: 2012/2.
Strangely, you have cases whose final decisions are not published:
Sak: 2011/2
Sak: 2010/2
Sak: 2010/1
Sak: 2008/04
Sak: 2008/02
Sak: 2008/01
Could you please clarify what "2012/708 - 1" means, what the case number is to be; and your Norwegian court process for proceeding.
Respectfully,
Lara Johnstone