For Your Information: [A] Inaccuracy of Mr. Breivik’s ‘conviction’: Breivik’s Conviction has been appealed by means of review.
On 27 August 2012 an application was filed with the Norwegian Supreme Court for Review of the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement, to set aside (A) the Necessity ruling, and (B) the conviction; and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of Further Evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. The finding of guilt, in the absence of full Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Conclusions renders the Guilt Finding Inadequate.
Email to National Post: Chris Selley:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:42 PM
To: 'NatPost: Chris Selley'
Subject: NatPost: C Selley: RE: Full Pundit: Praise for Anders Breivik’s Sane Sentence.
Mr. Chris Selley
National Post
Dear Mr. Selley,
RE: Full Pundit: Praise for Anders Breivik’s Sane Sentence.
For Your Information:
[A] Inaccuracy of Mr. Breivik’s ‘conviction’: Breivik’s Conviction has been appealed by means of review.
On 27 August 2012 an application was filed with the Norwegian Supreme Court for Review of the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement, to set aside (A) the Necessity ruling, and (B) the conviction; and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of Further Evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. The finding of guilt, in the absence of full Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Conclusions renders the Guilt Finding Inadequate.
[B] The ‘Rule of Law’ in Norway: Norway v. Breivik Judicial Ethics and Attorney Ethics Complaints Pending
[C] Norway’s Press Complaints Commission authorizes Norwegian Media to deceive the public, if the target of the deception consents to it.
Further details in attached PDF.
Respectfully,
Lara Johnstone
P O Box 5042
George East, 6539
Cel: (071) 170 1954