I am still awaiting a response upon my Appeal submitted to the Secretary General on 04 September 2012.
Relief Requested:
Order the: (A) Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association to provide complainant with their Written Reasons for their 28 August 2012 decision to refuse my representation that special circumstances of journalistic/editorial ethics warrant that my complaint (Case 239/12 - Lara Johnstone vs. Views and News from Norway) be processed in the absence of Mr. Breivik’s consent.
Alternatively, (C) If the Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association are sincerely concerned about the reasons for Mr. Breivik’s lack of consent; that the Committee ask Mr. Breivik to provide the Committee with an argument upon which he justifies his lack of consent; which would provide the Committee with a better understanding and an opportunity to reassess their 28 August decision whether Mr. Breivik’s reasons and evidence for his lack of consent are justified with regard to the relevant principles involved.
Text of Email:
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 9:13 AM
To: 'Kjell Nyhuus'; 'PFU: GenSec: Per Edgar Kokkvold'; 'PFU Pressens faglige utvalg'
Cc: 'Nina Berglund'; 'Crt: Lippestad: Tord Jordet'; 'Ingrid Nergården Jortveit'; 'Trude Hansen'; 'PFU: Sec: Monica Andersen'
Subject: RE: Appeal to PFU Sec.Gen. ITO Public Admin Act (S.23,24,25) & Freedom of Info Act (S.2): Case 239/12
Per Edgar Kokkvold: General Secretary
Kjell Nyhuus: Commission Secretary
Press Complaints Commission (PFU)
Box 46 Sentrum, 0101 Oslo
Email: [email protected]
CC: Editor: Nina Berglund, News and Views from Norway
CC: Mr. Anders Breivik: c/o Lippestad Attorneys
Appeal to Secretary General for Access to Information; in terms of (i) Statutes of the Press Complaints Commission, Section 4; (ii) Public Administration Act (PAA), section 23, 24, 25, and (iii) Freedom of
Information Act: Section 2. (PDF)
I am still awaiting a response upon my Appeal submitted to the Secretary General on 04 September 2012.
Relief Requested:
Order the:
(A) Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association to provide complainant with their Written Reasons for their 28 August 2012 decision to refuse my representation that special circumstances of journalistic/editorial ethics warrant that my complaint (Case 239/12 - Lara Johnstone vs. Views and News from Norway) be processed in the absence of Mr. Breivik’s consent.
Alternatively,
(C) If the Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association are sincerely concerned about the reasons for Mr. Breivik’s lack of consent; that the Committee ask Mr. Breivik to provide the Committee with an argument upon which he justifies his lack of consent; which would provide the Committee with a better understanding and an opportunity to reassess their 28 August decision whether Mr. Breivik’s reasons and evidence for his lack of consent are justified with regard to the relevant principles involved.
Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist
www.ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
www.facebook.com/Habeus.Mentem