Correspondence (PDF) to Env. Appeals Board: Benedikte Strom: Subject: RE: Appeals Board for Environmental Information Decisions: Media Censorship & AdvokatForengin Disc. Brd & Committee Request to Environment Appeals Board in terms of Public Administration Act (PAA), section 23, 24, 25, and (iii) Freedom of Information Act: Section 22. I have received no response to my request for information submitted to you on 08 October: Appeals Board for Environmental Information Decisions: Media Censorship & AdvokatForengin Disc. Brd & Committee; in response to your ruling of 18 September 2012. Relief Requested: In terms of the Public Administration Act, Section, 24, 25, and 26, and Freedom of Information Act, Section 2: Please could you kindly provide a ruling in consideration of clarifying what factual and legal grounds you considered in terms of coming to your conclusion that my complaint ‘clearly had to be denied’; including clarifying exactly how my complaints do not fit the definition of Environment as clarified by the Aarhus convention and LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law), as requested in correspondent of 08 October. |
Text of Email Notice:
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 9:32 PM
To: 'Benedikte Strøm'
Cc: 'Addresseavisen: Arne Blix'; 'Aftenposten: Hilde Haugsgjerd'; 'Bergens Tidende: Trine Eilertsen'; 'Dagbladet'; 'NRK: Hans Tore Bjerkaas'; 'TV2: Alf Hildrum'; 'VG: Torry Pedersen'; 'Advokat Foreningen'; 'AdvFor: Disciplinary Board'
Subject: RE: Appeals Board for Environmental Information Decisions: Media Censorship & AdvokatForengin Disc. Brd & Committee
03 November 2012
Benedikte Strøm
Secretary for the Environmental Information Appeals Board
Climate and Pollution Agency
Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96)
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06
Website: www.miljoklagenemnda.no
Ms. Strøm,
Request to Environment Appeals Board in terms of Public Administration Act (PAA), section 23, 24, 25, and (iii) Freedom of Information Act: Section 22.
I have received no response to my request for information submitted to you on 08 October: Appeals Board for Environmental Information Decisions: Media Censorship & AdvokatForengin Disc. Brd & Committee; in response to your ruling of 18 September 2012.
Relief Requested:
In terms of the Public Administration Act, Section, 24, 25, and 26, and Freedom of Information Act, Section 2:
Please could you kindly provide a ruling in consideration of clarifying what factual and legal grounds you considered in terms of coming to your conclusion that my complaint ‘clearly had to be denied’; including clarifying exactly how my complaints do not fit the definition of Environment as clarified by the Aarhus convention and LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law), as requested in correspondent of 08 October.
Request for Info PDF attached.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Johnstone