RH Complaints: Legal: Parliamentary Ombudsman:
PFU: Press Complaints Commission: Slow Appeal Processing
31 July 2012: Complaint filed with PFU: Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison
Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison: “Breivik’s trial ended in late June and his guilt was established long ago, but the court will rule on whether he’s sane and able to be sentenced to prison, or whether he’s insane and must be committed to psychiatric care instead.” |
|
03 Nov: Complaint to Parl Ombud: Slow Appeal Processing by PFU:
Complaint (PDF) submitted to Ombudsman of Slow Case Processing by PFU: Press Complaints Commission: RE: Appeal to PFU Sec.Gen. ITO Public Admin Act (S.23,24,25) & Freedom of Info Act (S.2): Case 239/12; Re: Complaint: News & Views from Norway: News in English Article.
Appeal to Secretary General for Access to Information; in terms of (i) Statutes of the Press Complaints Commission, Section 4; (ii) Public Administration Act (PAA), section 23, 24, 25, and (iii) Freedom of Information Act: Section 2.
Relief Requested: Order the: (A) Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association to provide complainant with their Written Reasons for their 28 August 2012 decision to refuse my representation that special circumstances of journalistic/editorial ethics warrant that my complaint (Case 239/12 - Lara Johnstone vs. Views and News from Norway) be processed in the absence of Mr. Breivik’s consent.
Alternatively, (B) If the Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association are sincerely concerned about the reasons for Mr. Breivik’s lack of consent; that the Committee ask Mr. Breivik to provide the Committee with an argument upon which he justifies his lack of consent; which would provide the Committee with a better understanding and an opportunity to reassess their 28 August decision whether Mr. Breivik’s reasons and evidence for his lack of consent are justified with regard to the relevant principles involved.
Appeal to Secretary General for Access to Information; in terms of (i) Statutes of the Press Complaints Commission, Section 4; (ii) Public Administration Act (PAA), section 23, 24, 25, and (iii) Freedom of Information Act: Section 2.
Relief Requested: Order the: (A) Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association to provide complainant with their Written Reasons for their 28 August 2012 decision to refuse my representation that special circumstances of journalistic/editorial ethics warrant that my complaint (Case 239/12 - Lara Johnstone vs. Views and News from Norway) be processed in the absence of Mr. Breivik’s consent.
Alternatively, (B) If the Secretariat of the Norwegian Press Association are sincerely concerned about the reasons for Mr. Breivik’s lack of consent; that the Committee ask Mr. Breivik to provide the Committee with an argument upon which he justifies his lack of consent; which would provide the Committee with a better understanding and an opportunity to reassess their 28 August decision whether Mr. Breivik’s reasons and evidence for his lack of consent are justified with regard to the relevant principles involved.
07 Nov: Decision by Parliamentary Ombudsman:
Decision by Parliamentary Ombudsman: Complaint Regarding the Norwegian Press Complaints Commission.
Reference is made to your letter 3 November 2012 where you seem to be asking for assistance from the Ombudsman in regards to slow case processing by The Norwegian Press Complaints Commission (PFU).
According to the Act concerning the Parliamentary Ombudsman for Public Administration 29 June 1962 No. 8 ("The Ombudsman Act") Section 4, the Ombudsman may consider complaints regarding "public services". Hence, the Ombudsman may investigate most types of matters that have been dealt with and decided on by Norwegian public authorities. Private disputes and questions regarding private associations and organisations, on the other hand, fall outside his jurisdiction. The Norwegian Press Complaints Commission (PFU) was established by the Norwegian Press Association and is not consider part of public administration.
Based on the above, your letter cannot be dealt with by the Ombudsman.
Reference is made to your letter 3 November 2012 where you seem to be asking for assistance from the Ombudsman in regards to slow case processing by The Norwegian Press Complaints Commission (PFU).
According to the Act concerning the Parliamentary Ombudsman for Public Administration 29 June 1962 No. 8 ("The Ombudsman Act") Section 4, the Ombudsman may consider complaints regarding "public services". Hence, the Ombudsman may investigate most types of matters that have been dealt with and decided on by Norwegian public authorities. Private disputes and questions regarding private associations and organisations, on the other hand, fall outside his jurisdiction. The Norwegian Press Complaints Commission (PFU) was established by the Norwegian Press Association and is not consider part of public administration.
Based on the above, your letter cannot be dealt with by the Ombudsman.
Parliamentary Ombudsman for Masonic War is Peace cultures only?
MILED Clerk confirmation of EoP Legal Submissions:
»» Norway Juridical bodies prohibit Buck Stops Here Ecology of Peace responsible freedom culture arguments and evidence for submission to Masonic War is Peace plausible deniable slavery freedumb culture Norway Juridical bodies. Norway Juridical bodies are WiP only. ««
»» Norway Juridical bodies prohibit Buck Stops Here Ecology of Peace responsible freedom culture arguments and evidence for submission to Masonic War is Peace plausible deniable slavery freedumb culture Norway Juridical bodies. Norway Juridical bodies are WiP only. ««