RH Court Records: Oslo District Court:
Judge Nina Opsahl:30 Nov 2011: Habeus Mentem ApplicationApplication for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review of Husby/Sorheim Psychiatric Report (PDF) (PoS). The application submitted to Judge Nina Opsahl requests an order that (A) Anders Breivik be provided a copy of this application for his consideration, and to be ordered to provide the court with his personal written response to the application, to be documented into the court record. (B) If approved by Anders Breivik, additional orders as follows: [I] A writ of Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011.
15 December 2011: Habeus Mentem Applic. UpdateCorrespondence to Court requesting response to Habeus Mentem Application.
|
Judge Wenche Arntzen:15 April 2012: Amicus Curiae ApplicationEcoFeminist Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae (PDF). The application submitted to Judge Arntzen requests Norway to charge Breivik with Treason, if convicted in a free and fair trial equivalent to the Apartheid trial provided to Nelson Mandela, that Breivik and the Applicant be executed by Firing Squad.
26 April 2012: Amicus Curiae Applic. UpdateCorrespondence to Court requesting response to Amicus Curiae Application.
|
10 May 2012: Review Application to Supreme Court:
10 May 2012: Review Applic to Supreme Court10 May Notice of Application for Review and Declaratory Order (PDF) submitted to Supreme Court Registrar and Chief Justice Tore Schei. Respondents: Judges Opsahl and Arntzen, Norway Refugee Council; UN Special Rapporteur: Indigenous Rights; ELENA; NOAS; Ministry of Culture; Progress Party; Muslim Society of Trondheim; NUPI.
|
10 May 2012: Review Applic to Supreme Court10 May Notice of Application for Review and Declaratory Order (PDF) submitted to Supreme Court Registrar and Chief Justice Tore Schei. Respondents: Judges Opsahl and Arntzen, Norway Refugee Council; UN Special Rapporteur: Indigenous Rights; ELENA; NOAS; Ministry of Culture; Progress Party; Muslim Society of Trondheim; NUPI.
|
28 May 2012: Bar Association Complaint:
28 May 2012: Bar Association ComplaintComplaint submitted to Bar Association: Disciplinary Committee: Violation of CCBE Code of Ethics: Complaint against Judge Nina Opsahl: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) | Klage mot dommer Nina Opsahl Brudd på: 2.1 (Uavhengighet), 2.2 (ærlighet), 2,4 (Multiculti Juridisk Respekt) og 4,1 (Rule of Law gjennomføre) CCBEs etiske regler (norsk oversettelse) (PDF)
|
28 May 2012: Bar Association Complaint:Complaint submitted to Bar Association: Disciplinary Committee: Violation of CCBE Code of Ethics:
Complaint against Judge Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) | Klage mot dommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen Brudd på: 2.1 (Uavhengighet), 2.2 (ærlighet), 2,4 (Multiculti Juridisk Respekt) og 4,1 (Rule of Law gjennomføre) CCBEs etiske regler (norsk oversettelse) (PDF)
|
30 May 2012: Complaint to Secretariat for Supervisory Committee for Judges:
30 May 2012: Complaint: Supv. Comm. JudgesComplaint submitted to Secretariat Supervisory Committee for Judges: Complaint against Judge Nina Opsahl: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges: 1. (Rule of Law), 2. (Independence), 3 (Impartiality), 4 (Integrity), 5 (Equality), 7 (Formulation of Court Decisions), 12 (Judges relation to the media). (PDF)
06 June 2012: Complaint: Supv. Comm. JudgesUpdated Complaint submitted to Secretariat Supervisory Committee for Judges:
Complaint against Judge Nina Opsahl: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges: 1. (Rule of Law), 2. (Independence), 3 (Impartiality), 4 (Integrity), 5 (Equality), 7 (Formulation of Court Decisions), 12 (Judges relation to the media). (PDF)
|
30 May 2012: Complaint: Supv. Comm. JudgesComplaint submitted to Secretariat Supervisory Committee for Judges: Complaint against Judge Wenche Elisabeth Arntzen: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges: 1. (Rule of Law), 2. (Independence), 3 (Impartiality), 4 (Integrity), 5 (Equality), 7 (Formulation of Court Decisions), 12 (Judges relation to the media). (PDF)
06 June 2012: Complaint: Supv. Comm. JudgesUpdated Complaint submitted to Secretariat Supervisory Committee for Judges: Complaint against Judge Wenche Elisabeth Arntzen: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges: 1. (Rule of Law), 2. (Independence), 3 (Impartiality), 4 (Integrity), 5 (Equality), 7 (Formulation of Court Decisions), 12 (Judges relation to the media). (PDF)
|
Continued at:
Supervisory Committee for Judges: Complaint:
12-071: Judge Nina Opsahl & 12-072: Judge Wenche Arntzen
Supervisory Committee for Judges: Complaint:
12-071: Judge Nina Opsahl & 12-072: Judge Wenche Arntzen
Norway Juridical Bodies for War is Peace only cultures?
MILED Clerk confirmation of EoP Legal Submissions:
»» Norway Juridical bodies prohibit Buck Stops Here Ecology of Peace responsible freedom culture arguments and evidence for submission to Masonic War is Peace plausible deniable slavery freedumb culture Norway Juridical bodies. Norway Juridical bodies are WiP only. ««
»» Norway Juridical bodies prohibit Buck Stops Here Ecology of Peace responsible freedom culture arguments and evidence for submission to Masonic War is Peace plausible deniable slavery freedumb culture Norway Juridical bodies. Norway Juridical bodies are WiP only. ««