For Your Information: Censored by Norwegian Media:
 Norway’s 28 Aug 2012 Press Complaints Commission (PFU) decision authorizes Norwegian Media to deceive the public, if the target of the deception consents to it. [PFU: Lara Johnstone vs. News with Views in Norway]
 The ‘Rule of Law’ in Norway: Pending Norway v. Breivik Judicial Ethics and Attorney Ethics Complaints
 Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik’s ‘conviction’: Breivik’s Conviction has been appealed to Supreme Court by means of application for review.
On 27 August 2012 an application was filed with the Norwegian Supreme Court for Review of the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement, to set aside (A) the Necessity ruling, and (B) the conviction; to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. The finding of guilt, in the absence of full Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Conclusions renders the Guilt Finding Inadequate.
[D] Possible Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik’s Motivation: Islamification of Europe Problem Solving, or Bullshit the Public Self Promotion Parasite Leeching?