To: 'Press Complaints Commission'; 'Norway News in English
Subject: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago' (PDF)
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:19 PM
To: Mr. Breivik: Request for Consent to file Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison (PDF)
Orders Request:
(A) Correct the error of her statement that “Breivik’s guilt has been established (long ago)”; and/or provide the source for her statement of alleged fact. (B) Confirm that Anders Breivik’s is entitled to due process, including the right to be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to the rule of law; and that no court of law has yet found Anders Breivik Guilty of any crime, and; (C) Apologize to Mr. Anders Breivik for violating his right to the presumption of innocence, and; (D) Apologize to her readers, for encouraging them to participate in the process of trial by media to violate Mr. Breivik’s right to the presumption of innocence.
Text: Email Notice of Request of Consent to Mr. Breivik:
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:19 PM
To: NO: Crt: Breivik: Geir Lippestad; NO: Lippestad: Tord; NO: Lippestad: Odd
Cc: 'Press Complaints Commission'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'
Subject: Mr. Breivik c/o Lippestad Attorneys: Req. Consent for PFU Complaint Against Nina Berglund's statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago' (PDF)
Mr. Anders Breivik
c/o: Lippestad Attorneys
CC: Press Complaints Commission (PFU)
Box 46 Sentrum, 0101 Oslo
CC: Editor: Nina Berglund
News and Views from Norway
Request for Consent to file Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison
Please find attached the complaint filed with the Press Complaints Commission (PFU), which requires your consent, related to the arguments made therein. (PDF)
It is my allegation that Ms. Berglund’s statement that Mr. Breivik’s ‘guilt was established long ago’ is not factually or legally correct.
It is my argument that only persons who (A) are totally ignorant of objectively applying the principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to rules of evidence and due process; and/or (B) endorse the denial of the principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to rules of evidence and due process to Mr. Breivik; could make the statement that: Breivik has been found guilty in a court of law.
The prosecutor’s irregular decisions to ‘refuse to touch Breivik’s invocation of Necessity’ does not:
(a) have the power to nullify Breivik’s invocation of necessity;
(b) grant the court the authority to ‘refuse to touch Breivik’s invocation of necessity’;
(c) grant the media the authority to find Mr. Breivik ‘guilty’ in a ‘trial by media ignorance of the law’.
Relief Requested:
I accordingly request News with Views: Ms. Nina Burgland to be ordered to:
(A) Correct the error of her statement that “Breivik’s guilt has been established (long ago)”; and/or provide the source for her statement of alleged fact.
(B) Confirm that Anders Breivik’s is entitled to due process, including the right to be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to the rule of law; and that no court of law has yet found Anders Breivik Guilty of any crime, and;
(C) Apologize to Mr. Anders Breivik for violating his right to the presumption of innocence, and;
(D) Apologize to her readers, for encouraging them to participate in the process of trial by media to violate Mr. Breivik’s right to the presumption of innocence.
Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/
Notice of Complaint to Press Complaints Commission:
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:14 PM
To: 'Press Complaints Commission'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'
Subject: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago' (PDF)
Press Complaints Commission (PFU)
Box 46 Sentrum, 0101 Oslo
CC: Editor: Nina Berglund
News and Views from Norway
Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison
Please Note: Attached is a letter submitted to Mr. Anders Breivik, via his Legal Representatives: Lippestad Attorneys, requesting his consent, related to the arguments made in this complaint.
This complaint relates to the following statement made by Ms. Berglund in her article: Breivik Moved to New Prison:
"Breivik’s trial ended in late June and his guilt was established long ago, but the court will rule on whether he’s sane and able to be sentenced to prison, or whether he’s insane and must be committed to psychiatric care instead."
Summary of Argument:
It is my argument that only persons who (A) are totally ignorant of objectively applying the principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to rules of evidence and due process; and/or (B) endorse the denial of the principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to rules of evidence and due process to Mr. Breivik; could make the statement that: Breivik has been found guilty in a court of law.
The prosecutor’s irregular decisions to ‘refuse to touch Breivik’s invocation of Necessity’ does not:
(a) have the power to nullify Breivik’s invocation of necessity;
(b) grant the court the authority to ‘refuse to touch Breivik’s invocation of necessity’;
(c) grant the media the authority to find Mr. Breivik ‘guilty’ in a ‘trial by media ignorance of the law’.
Please find complete complaint in attached PDF.
Relief Requested:
I accordingly request News with Views: Ms. Nina Burgland to be ordered to:
(A) Correct the error of her statement that “Breivik’s guilt has been established (long ago)”; and/or provide the source for her statement of alleged fact.
(B) Confirm that Anders Breivik’s is entitled to due process, including the right to be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to the rule of law; and that no court of law has yet found Anders Breivik Guilty of any crime, and;
(C) Apologize to Mr. Anders Breivik for violating his right to the presumption of innocence, and;
(D) Apologize to her readers, for encouraging them to participate in the process of trial by media to violate Mr. Breivik’s right to the presumption of innocence.
Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/
[Text of Complaint in HTML]