Request to Mr. Tord Jordet, Lippestad Attorneys:
RE: Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison. The PFU appear to be refusing to process my complaint without Mr. Breivik's consent. Unfuckingbelievable!!!
1. Has Mr. Breivik received the request for consent?
2. If so, when does he intend responding?
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Lippestad Attorneys: RE: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
RE: Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison. The PFU appear to be refusing to process my complaint without Mr. Breivik's consent. Unfuckingbelievable!!!
1. Has Mr. Breivik received the request for consent?
2. If so, when does he intend responding?
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Lippestad Attorneys: RE: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Text of Email:
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:40 PM
To: 'Tord Jordet'
Cc: 'Ingrid Nergården Jortveit'; 'Trude Hansen'; 'PFU: Sec: Monica Andersen'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'; 'Kjell Nyhuus'; 'PFU: GenSec: Per Edgar Kokkvold'
Subject: Lippestad Attorneys: RE: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Tord Jordet
Lippestad Attorneys
Mr. Jordet,
RE: Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison
The PFU appear to be refusing to process my complaint without Mr. Breivik's consent. Unfuckingbelievable!!!
1. Has Mr. Breivik received the request for consent?
2. If so, when does he intend responding?
Respectfully,
Lara Johnstone
-----Original Message-----
From: Kjell Nyhuus [**@presse.no]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:14 PM
To: Lara; PFU: GenSec: Per Edgar Kokkvold
Cc: Ingrid Nergården Jortveit; Trude Hansen; PFU: Sec: Monica Andersen; Norway News in English: Nina Berglund
Subject: RE: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Status of your complaint.
As we as of now have not heard from mr. Breivik (or his legal team) the complaint not in process. I can assure you that this complaint cannot be handled by the commission without his approval.
The editor of Views and News, Nina Berglund, is on holiday. We must also clarify with her if her website is within our area. She'll be back on august 18.th.
On behalf of
The Norwegian Press Complaints Commission
Kjell Nyhuus
Commission secretary
Norsk Presseforbund/Pressens Faglige Utvalg
Postboks 46 Sentrum
0107 Oslo
Tlf 22 40 50 40
Dir 22 40 50 43
Mob 91 34 51 59
E-post: mailto:pfu@presse.no/ mailto:kjell.nyhuus@presse.no
Web: www.presse.no
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Lara Johnstone
Sendt: 10. august 2012 10:23
Til: 'PFU: GenSec: Per Edgar Kokkvold'
Kopi: Kjell Nyhuus; Ingrid Nergården Jortveit; Trude Hansen; Trude Hansen; 'PFU: Sec: Monica Andersen'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'
Emne: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Gen.Sec. Mr. Per Edgar Kokkvold
Press Complaints Commission (PFU)
Box 46 Sentrum, 0101 Oslo
RE: Status of Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison (PDF Attached)
Please could the PFU provide me with a status report regarding the processing of my aforementioned complaint.
I seriously doubt Mr. Breivik has any objections to the complaint; I imagine to the contrary.
On 02 August, Mr. Tord Jordet informed me that "I have printed your e-mail and the attached PDF documents, and will send this to Breivik today."
As of today, there has not yet been a response from Mr. Breivik; if the prison officials have provided him with the correspondence.
However even if Mr. Breivik does have objections to my complaint (if he would prefer the Norwegian Elite to continue responding in the fascist fashion which they have to the 22 July attacks, to thereby (a) unequivocally confirm Mr. Breivik's allegations about the corrupt fascist Norwegian state; and (b) help Mr. Breivik to increase his following by making him a martyr of the corrupt Norwegian State[1]), as an incorruptible Radical Honoursty Problem Solving EcoFeminist, uncorrupted by Masculine Insecurity Patriarchal Parasite Leeching; I still demand the complaint be processed.
Consequently: Please could the PFU provide me with a status report regarding the processing of my aforementioned complaint.
This complaint relates to the following statement made by Ms. Berglund in her article: Breivik Moved to New Prison:
"Breivik's trial ended in late June and his guilt was established long ago, but the court will rule on whether he's sane and able to be sentenced to prison, or whether he's insane and must be committed to psychiatric care instead."
Summary of Argument:
It is my argument that only persons who (A) are totally ignorant of objectively applying the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process; and/or (B) endorse the denial of the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process to Mr. Breivik; could make the statement that: Breivik has been found guilty in a court of law.
The prosecutor's irregular decisions to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of Necessity' does not:
(a) have the power to nullify Breivik's invocation of necessity;
(b) grant the court the authority to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of necessity';
(c) grant the media the authority to find Mr. Breivik 'guilty' in a 'trial by media ignorance of the law'.
Please find complete complaint in attached PDF.
Relief Requested:
I accordingly request News with Views: Ms. Nina Burgland to be ordered to:
(A) Correct the error of her statement that "Breivik's guilt has been established (long ago)"; and/or provide the source for her statement of alleged fact.
(B) Confirm that Anders Breivik's is entitled to due process, including the right to be considered 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to the rule of law; and that no court of law has yet found Anders Breivik Guilty of any crime, and;
(C) Apologize to Mr. Anders Breivik for violating his right to the presumption of innocence, and;
(D) Apologize to her readers, for encouraging them to participate in the process of trial by media to violate Mr. Breivik's right to the presumption of innocence.
Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/
http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com
[1] Corrupt Norwegian State
http://norge-korrupsjon.blogspot.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:14 PM
To: 'Press Complaints Commission'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'
Subject: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Press Complaints Commission (PFU)
Box 46 Sentrum, 0101 Oslo
Email: pfu@presse.no
CC: Editor: Nina Berglund
News and Views from Norway
Email: nina@newsinenglish.no
Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison
Please Note: Attached is a letter submitted to Mr. Anders Breivik, via his Legal Representatives: Lippestad Attorneys, requesting his consent, related to the arguments made in this complaint.
This complaint relates to the following statement made by Ms. Berglund in her article: Breivik Moved to New Prison:
"Breivik's trial ended in late June and his guilt was established long ago, but the court will rule on whether he's sane and able to be sentenced to prison, or whether he's insane and must be committed to psychiatric care instead."
Summary of Argument:
It is my argument that only persons who (A) are totally ignorant of objectively applying the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process; and/or (B) endorse the denial of the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process to Mr. Breivik; could make the statement that: Breivik has been found guilty in a court of law.
The prosecutor's irregular decisions to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of Necessity' does not:
(a) have the power to nullify Breivik's invocation of necessity;
(b) grant the court the authority to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of necessity';
(c) grant the media the authority to find Mr. Breivik 'guilty' in a 'trial by media ignorance of the law'.
Please find complete complaint in attached PDF.
Relief Requested:
I accordingly request News with Views: Ms. Nina Burgland to be ordered to:
(A) Correct the error of her statement that "Breivik's guilt has been established (long ago)"; and/or provide the source for her statement of alleged fact.
(B) Confirm that Anders Breivik's is entitled to due process, including the right to be considered 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to the rule of law; and that no court of law has yet found Anders Breivik Guilty of any crime, and;
(C) Apologize to Mr. Anders Breivik for violating his right to the presumption of innocence, and;
(D) Apologize to her readers, for encouraging them to participate in the process of trial by media to violate Mr. Breivik's right to the presumption of innocence.
Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:40 PM
To: 'Tord Jordet'
Cc: 'Ingrid Nergården Jortveit'; 'Trude Hansen'; 'PFU: Sec: Monica Andersen'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'; 'Kjell Nyhuus'; 'PFU: GenSec: Per Edgar Kokkvold'
Subject: Lippestad Attorneys: RE: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Tord Jordet
Lippestad Attorneys
Mr. Jordet,
RE: Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison
The PFU appear to be refusing to process my complaint without Mr. Breivik's consent. Unfuckingbelievable!!!
1. Has Mr. Breivik received the request for consent?
2. If so, when does he intend responding?
Respectfully,
Lara Johnstone
-----Original Message-----
From: Kjell Nyhuus [**@presse.no]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:14 PM
To: Lara; PFU: GenSec: Per Edgar Kokkvold
Cc: Ingrid Nergården Jortveit; Trude Hansen; PFU: Sec: Monica Andersen; Norway News in English: Nina Berglund
Subject: RE: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Status of your complaint.
As we as of now have not heard from mr. Breivik (or his legal team) the complaint not in process. I can assure you that this complaint cannot be handled by the commission without his approval.
The editor of Views and News, Nina Berglund, is on holiday. We must also clarify with her if her website is within our area. She'll be back on august 18.th.
On behalf of
The Norwegian Press Complaints Commission
Kjell Nyhuus
Commission secretary
Norsk Presseforbund/Pressens Faglige Utvalg
Postboks 46 Sentrum
0107 Oslo
Tlf 22 40 50 40
Dir 22 40 50 43
Mob 91 34 51 59
E-post: mailto:pfu@presse.no/ mailto:kjell.nyhuus@presse.no
Web: www.presse.no
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Lara Johnstone
Sendt: 10. august 2012 10:23
Til: 'PFU: GenSec: Per Edgar Kokkvold'
Kopi: Kjell Nyhuus; Ingrid Nergården Jortveit; Trude Hansen; Trude Hansen; 'PFU: Sec: Monica Andersen'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'
Emne: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Gen.Sec. Mr. Per Edgar Kokkvold
Press Complaints Commission (PFU)
Box 46 Sentrum, 0101 Oslo
RE: Status of Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison (PDF Attached)
Please could the PFU provide me with a status report regarding the processing of my aforementioned complaint.
I seriously doubt Mr. Breivik has any objections to the complaint; I imagine to the contrary.
On 02 August, Mr. Tord Jordet informed me that "I have printed your e-mail and the attached PDF documents, and will send this to Breivik today."
As of today, there has not yet been a response from Mr. Breivik; if the prison officials have provided him with the correspondence.
However even if Mr. Breivik does have objections to my complaint (if he would prefer the Norwegian Elite to continue responding in the fascist fashion which they have to the 22 July attacks, to thereby (a) unequivocally confirm Mr. Breivik's allegations about the corrupt fascist Norwegian state; and (b) help Mr. Breivik to increase his following by making him a martyr of the corrupt Norwegian State[1]), as an incorruptible Radical Honoursty Problem Solving EcoFeminist, uncorrupted by Masculine Insecurity Patriarchal Parasite Leeching; I still demand the complaint be processed.
Consequently: Please could the PFU provide me with a status report regarding the processing of my aforementioned complaint.
This complaint relates to the following statement made by Ms. Berglund in her article: Breivik Moved to New Prison:
"Breivik's trial ended in late June and his guilt was established long ago, but the court will rule on whether he's sane and able to be sentenced to prison, or whether he's insane and must be committed to psychiatric care instead."
Summary of Argument:
It is my argument that only persons who (A) are totally ignorant of objectively applying the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process; and/or (B) endorse the denial of the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process to Mr. Breivik; could make the statement that: Breivik has been found guilty in a court of law.
The prosecutor's irregular decisions to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of Necessity' does not:
(a) have the power to nullify Breivik's invocation of necessity;
(b) grant the court the authority to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of necessity';
(c) grant the media the authority to find Mr. Breivik 'guilty' in a 'trial by media ignorance of the law'.
Please find complete complaint in attached PDF.
Relief Requested:
I accordingly request News with Views: Ms. Nina Burgland to be ordered to:
(A) Correct the error of her statement that "Breivik's guilt has been established (long ago)"; and/or provide the source for her statement of alleged fact.
(B) Confirm that Anders Breivik's is entitled to due process, including the right to be considered 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to the rule of law; and that no court of law has yet found Anders Breivik Guilty of any crime, and;
(C) Apologize to Mr. Anders Breivik for violating his right to the presumption of innocence, and;
(D) Apologize to her readers, for encouraging them to participate in the process of trial by media to violate Mr. Breivik's right to the presumption of innocence.
Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/
http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com
[1] Corrupt Norwegian State
http://norge-korrupsjon.blogspot.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:14 PM
To: 'Press Complaints Commission'; 'Norway News in English: Nina Berglund'
Subject: PFU Complaint: Norway News in English: Nina Berglund Erroneous Statement: 'Breivik Guilt Established Long Ago'
Press Complaints Commission (PFU)
Box 46 Sentrum, 0101 Oslo
Email: pfu@presse.no
CC: Editor: Nina Berglund
News and Views from Norway
Email: nina@newsinenglish.no
Complaint against Nina Berglund, Editor: News & Views from Norway: Violation of 3.1, 3.2, 4.5 of Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press in Article: Breivik Moved to New Prison
Please Note: Attached is a letter submitted to Mr. Anders Breivik, via his Legal Representatives: Lippestad Attorneys, requesting his consent, related to the arguments made in this complaint.
This complaint relates to the following statement made by Ms. Berglund in her article: Breivik Moved to New Prison:
"Breivik's trial ended in late June and his guilt was established long ago, but the court will rule on whether he's sane and able to be sentenced to prison, or whether he's insane and must be committed to psychiatric care instead."
Summary of Argument:
It is my argument that only persons who (A) are totally ignorant of objectively applying the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process; and/or (B) endorse the denial of the principles of 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to rules of evidence and due process to Mr. Breivik; could make the statement that: Breivik has been found guilty in a court of law.
The prosecutor's irregular decisions to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of Necessity' does not:
(a) have the power to nullify Breivik's invocation of necessity;
(b) grant the court the authority to 'refuse to touch Breivik's invocation of necessity';
(c) grant the media the authority to find Mr. Breivik 'guilty' in a 'trial by media ignorance of the law'.
Please find complete complaint in attached PDF.
Relief Requested:
I accordingly request News with Views: Ms. Nina Burgland to be ordered to:
(A) Correct the error of her statement that "Breivik's guilt has been established (long ago)"; and/or provide the source for her statement of alleged fact.
(B) Confirm that Anders Breivik's is entitled to due process, including the right to be considered 'innocent until proven guilty' in accordance to the rule of law; and that no court of law has yet found Anders Breivik Guilty of any crime, and;
(C) Apologize to Mr. Anders Breivik for violating his right to the presumption of innocence, and;
(D) Apologize to her readers, for encouraging them to participate in the process of trial by media to violate Mr. Breivik's right to the presumption of innocence.
Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/
RSS Feed
