Message: Factual Error: "Breivik case formally over as appeals period expires without challenge from far-right guman"
The Breivik case is not ‘formally over’:
(1) 27 August Application to Supreme Court for Review of Breivik Judgement.
On 27 August 2012 an application was filed with the Norwegian Supreme Court for Review of the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement, to set aside (A) the Necessity ruling, and (B) the conviction and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of further evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. The finding of guilt, in the absence of full Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Conclusions renders the Guilt Finding Inadequate.
The Norwegian Supreme Court Registrar has so far refused to issue a Case Number for the Application for Review of the Breivik Judgement, or to provide reasons for their refusal. A complaint of Slow Case Processing against the Supreme Court Registrar was submitted to the Parliamentary Ombudsman on 02 September 2012.
Receipt Text of Online Email Sent to Washington Post:
Ticket #: 15067-49960
Date Created: 9/07/2012 08:06 PM EDT
Ticket Origin: Email
Reader: jmcswan (**@mweb.co.za)
Summary: Factual Error: Breivik case formally over
Description:
The following information was generated from a web contact:
Lara Johnstone E-mail: [email protected]
Subject: Factual Error: Breivik case formally over
Message: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/breivik-case-formally-over-as-appeals-period-expires-without-challenge-from-far-right-guman/2012/09/07/45cddd40-f8ed-11e1-a93b-7185e3f88849_story.html
Factual Error: "Breivik case formally over as appeals period expires without challenge from far-right guman"
The Breivik case is not ‘formally over’:
(1) 27 August Application to Supreme Court for Review of Breivik Judgement.
On 27 August 2012 an application was filed with the Norwegian Supreme Court for Review of the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement, to set aside (A) the Necessity ruling, and (B) the conviction and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of further evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. The finding of guilt, in the absence of full Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Conclusions renders the Guilt Finding Inadequate.
Additionally the application for review also requested an Order to Set Aside the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement’s failure to disclose the pending Judicial Ethics violation complaint against Judge Wenche Arntzen, filed on 06 June 2012 to the Secretariaty for the Supervisory Committee for Judges (Case 2012-072 ), as a violation of Aarhus Convention Article 3.(3)(4)(5) principles and general ECHR public accountability transparency (Lithgow & Others v. United Kingdom) principles.
The Norwegian Supreme Court Registrar has so far refused to issue a Case Number for the Application for Review of the Breivik Judgement, or to provide reasons for their refusal. A complaint of Slow Case Processing against the Supreme Court Registrar was submitted to the Parliamentary Ombudsman on 02 September 2012.
Mr. Breivik, his attorneys: Mr. Geir Lippestad and Ms. Baera; and Ms. Siv Hallgren, Ms. Yvonne Mette Larsen and Mr. Frode Elgesem (attorney’s liaison for all attorneys representing victims families), Prosecutors Svein Holden and Inga Bejer Engh are all well aware of the Application for Review. 2 Pending Judicial Ethics violation complaint against Judge Wenche Arntzen with Supervisory Committee for Judges (Case 2012-072)
From: Eiken, Espen **@domstoladministrasjonen.no
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 2:45 PM
To: 'Lara'
Subject: RE: 31.08 RE: Tilsynsutvalget for dommere - Klage: Justice Tore Schei, Judge Wenche Arntzen, Judge Nina Opsahl
Your complaints have been given the case numbers 12-071 (Judge Nina Opsahl), 12-072 (Judge Wenche E. Arntzen) and 12-073 (Justice Tore Schei). The complete handling time can be close to six months. If a party have given a statement in the case, these will be provided the complainant. The Supervisory Committee has not received statements from the other parties involved.
On behalf of the Supervisory Committee for Judges Espen Eiken Senior Adviser
Notifications to Norwegian Foreign Press Association (FPA)
The Norwegian Foreign Press Association as well as all their members, which include journalists from Reuters, Agence France Presse (AFP), Associated Press (AP), Al Arabija, Al Jazeera, BBC, Bloomberg, Globe and Mail, Xinhua, Die Welt, Irish Times, Himalayan Times, Itar-Tass, etc., were notified by 13:00 hrs (GM+2) on 07 September 2012 of aforementioned information, that: (A) Application for Review of Breivik Judgement filed with Norway Supreme Court; (B) Complaint filed with Parliamentary Ombudsman against Supreme Court, for slow case processing; (C) Pending Judicial Ethics violation complaint against Judge Wenche Arntzen.
All aforementioned documents are available at: http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com
Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone