I have filed an application for Review of the Anders Breivik Oslo District Court Judgement, with the Norway Supreme Court, that involves Anti-Civilisation Licence-to-Breed Population Reduction Wild Law related issues. This is simply a transparency notice to inform you of the application, should you wish to provide any feedback (recommend Scandinavian ecological lawyers?), get involved, or otherwise.
The application has three aspects that are Wild Law or Ecologically Focussed:
[1] Courts Breivik Judgement is a Left vs. Right Wing Blame Game Judgement, not an Ecological Root Cause Problem Solving Judgement:
[2] Denying Breivik his ‘Necessity’ Defence Right to an Objective and Subjective Test of his Evidence sets horrific Precedent for Denying other Activists, including EcoWarrior Necessity Activists their Necessity Test Rights:
[3] Judgement’s Transparency Failure violates Aarhus Environment Transparency Convention principles and public accountability impartiality principles.
Text of Email Notice:
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:48 PM
To: 'NatHerFnd'
Cc: 'Turku Univ'; 'YLE.FI'; 'YLE.Kultuur'
Subject: Pentti Linkolian Wild Law Application to Norway Supreme Court: Review of Breivik Judgement
Anti-Civilisation Linkolian’s
Mr. Pentti Linkola
Natural Heritage Foundation
Luonnonperintösäätiö
Palokunnankatu 24 B 29, 13100 Hämeenlinna
Dear Mr. Linkola & Anti-Civilisation Linkolians,
Subject: Pentti Linkolian Wild Law Application to Norway Supreme Court: Review of Breivik Judgement
I have filed an application for Review of the Anders Breivik Oslo District Court Judgement, with the Norway Supreme Court, that involves Anti-Civilisation Licence-to-Breed Population Reduction Wild Law related issues. This is simply a transparency notice to inform you of the application, should you wish to provide any feedback (recommend Scandinavian ecological lawyers?), get involved, or otherwise.
The application has three aspects that are Wild Law or Ecologically Focussed:
[1] Courts Breivik Judgement is a Left vs. Right Wing Blame Game Judgement, not an Ecological Root Cause Problem Solving Judgement:
The Courts Judgement of Breivik - like most Patriarchal Anthropocentric legalism - is about Left vs. Right Wing Blame Game polarisation and parasitisim, not about transparent root cause problem solving, which requires confronting the ecological and lack of psychological integrity root causes of our disputes.
[2] Denying Breivik his ‘Necessity’ Defence Right to an Objective and Subjective Test of his Evidence sets horrific Precedent for Denying other Activists, including EcoWarrior Necessity Activists their Necessity Test Rights:
If the court denies Breivik the required objective and subjective test, that is required for any defendant who pleads to necessity... then some day when some Pentti Linkolian eco-warrior goes out and commits some eco-necessity criminal act... then the public are so ignorant about what is required of a court when an accused pleads to necessity, then nobody will demand that the accused’s argument be tested according to the required objective and subjective necessity defense test.
[3] Judgement’s Transparency Failure violates Aarhus Environment Transparency Convention principles and public accountability impartiality principles.
More info about each issue in attached pdf, including excerpts from Notice of Motion and Affidavit, and if interested links to reading full Notice of Motion and Affidavit.
Linkolian EcoRights Regards,
Lara Johnstone