Parliamentary Ombudsman Complaint
Slow Case Processing / Failure to Provide Case Processing by Supreme Court Registrar; to Application for Review of ‘Breivik Judgement’.
Slow Case Processing: Application for Review of ‘Breivik Judgement’ filed with Supreme Court Registrar on 27 August 2012 to Set Aside the Judgements (1) ‘Necessity (Nodrett) Ruling’ and (2) Defendant’s Conviction (Finding of Guilt) and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of Further Evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. Subsequent follow up requests made on 28 August and 31st August requesting Registrar to provide a case number, or clarify their reasons for failure to provide a case number.
Text of Email:
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:14 AM
To: Crt: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei; HRET: postmottak
Cc: Helga Mærde Gruer; Kjersti Ruud ; [email protected]; Dep.Sec.Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard; Ch.Justice Tore Schei
Subject: Supreme Court Registrar: Notice of Review of 24.08.2012 Breivik Judgement - Parl Ombudsman Complaint
Parliamentary Ombudsman Complaint
Slow Case Processing / Failure to Provide Case Processing by Supreme Court Registrar; to Application for Review of ‘Breivik Judgement’.
Slow Case Processing: Application for Review of ‘Breivik Judgement’ filed with Supreme Court Registrar on 27 August 2012 to Set Aside the Judgements (1) ‘Necessity (Nodrett) Ruling’ and (2) Defendant’s Conviction (Finding of Guilt) and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of Further Evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. Subsequent follow up requests made on 28 August and 31st August requesting Registrar to provide a case number, or clarify their reasons for failure to provide a case number.
Complaint Attached (PDF).
Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com