I am still awaiting a response to my request sent Tuesday, September 11, 2012 12:04 AM.
In the absence of a response by 10 October 2012, I shall conclude you have no intention of responding, and refer the matter to the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
Relief Requested as per attached: Response to: Sec.Gen decision of 09.09.2012, to Application for review of Oslo District Court's judgment
of 24 August 2012 (2011-188627-24)
Could you kindly provide me with the relevant statute in Norway that provides the Secretary General the authority to refuse to process a case, citing lack of locus standi/legal standing; thereby denying such applicant due process access to be heard by an impartial court?
It is my understanding – perhaps incorrect - that it is not a matter for the Secretary General to make a final ruling on the relevant locus standi / legal interest of any party in any dispute, but for the court, if any party raises the matter as a matter of dispute.
Text of Email:
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 11:15 AM
To: 'Helga Mærde Gruer'; 'SecGen: Gunnar Bergby'
Cc: 'Crt: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei'; 'Ch.Justice Tore Schei'; 'Dep.Sec.Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard'; 'Svein Tore Andersen'; 'Kjersti Ruud '
Subject: RE: Response to Sec.Gen G.Bergby decision of 09.09.2012 in Review of Breivik Judgement Application (2011-188627-24)
Gunnar Bergby
Secretary-General / President
Supreme Court of Norway
Secretary General Bergby,
Re: Sec.Gen decision of 09.09.2012, to Application for review of Oslo District Court's judgment of 24 August 2012 (2011-188627-24)
I am still awaiting a response to my request sent Tuesday, September 11, 2012 12:04 AM.
In the absence of a response by 10 October 2012, I shall conclude you have no intention of responding, and refer the matter to the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
Relief Requested as per attached: Response to: Sec.Gen decision of 09.09.2012, to Application for review of Oslo District Court's judgment
of 24 August 2012 (2011-188627-24)
Could you kindly provide me with the relevant statute in Norway that provides the Secretary General the authority to refuse to process a case, citing lack of locus standi/legal standing; thereby denying such applicant due process access to be heard by an impartial court?
It is my understanding – perhaps incorrect - that it is not a matter for the Secretary General to make a final ruling on the relevant locus standi / legal interest of any party in any dispute, but for the court, if any party raises the matter as a matter of dispute.
Respectfully,
Lara Johnstone
Disclosure: The Norwegian Government and Media's massive corruption in the Norway v. Breivik matter has been referenced in the Amicus filed to the United States Court of Appeals for Armed Forces (USCAAF) in CCR / Wikileaks vs USA. Copy of Affidavit and Amicus Brief attached.